Difference between revisions of "Jeff Conklin"
(Pointing) |
(Some context and a quick aside on meetings) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Draft}} | {{Draft}} | ||
My work with [[Doug Engelbart]] focused on augmenting human processes with technology. Even though Doug cared about hyper''media'', we focused largely on hyper''text''. We also were focused more on high-level group processes rather than... well, meetings! We facilitated meetings in very traditional ways — there was an agenda and a facilitator, and the facilitator would try to get the whole group (regardless of size) through the agenda. | |||
: Most folks who self-identify as professional [[collaboration practitioners]] focus on meetings. While meetings are important, they are only one potential tool when folks collaborate. I think this [http://groupaya.net/group-process-on-steroids/ overarching emphasis on meetings is problematic]. I also think that, while most practitioners are meeting-centric, very few are actually good at designing good meetings, especially as the number and diversity of participants grow and the problems get more complex. --[[User:Eekim|Eekim]] ([[User talk:Eekim|talk]]) 23:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Two intellectual grandfathers: [[Doug Engelbart]] and Horst Rittel. | Two intellectual grandfathers: [[Doug Engelbart]] and Horst Rittel. | ||
== Lessons Learned == | |||
Framing around wicked problems. | Framing around wicked problems. | ||
Shared display, shared understanding, and artifacts. Strong role this plays in facilitation. | Shared display, shared understanding, and artifacts. Strong role this plays in facilitation. | ||
Tic-Tac-Toe | |||
IBIS grammar | |||
Question-centrism and the Left-Hand Move | |||
Making the display part of the room | |||
Pointing. | Pointing. |
Revision as of 23:01, 9 January 2017
40x40px | This is a Work-In-Progress. Feel free to edit! |
My work with Doug Engelbart focused on augmenting human processes with technology. Even though Doug cared about hypermedia, we focused largely on hypertext. We also were focused more on high-level group processes rather than... well, meetings! We facilitated meetings in very traditional ways — there was an agenda and a facilitator, and the facilitator would try to get the whole group (regardless of size) through the agenda.
- Most folks who self-identify as professional collaboration practitioners focus on meetings. While meetings are important, they are only one potential tool when folks collaborate. I think this overarching emphasis on meetings is problematic. I also think that, while most practitioners are meeting-centric, very few are actually good at designing good meetings, especially as the number and diversity of participants grow and the problems get more complex. --Eekim (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Two intellectual grandfathers: Doug Engelbart and Horst Rittel.
Lessons Learned
Framing around wicked problems.
Shared display, shared understanding, and artifacts. Strong role this plays in facilitation.
Tic-Tac-Toe
IBIS grammar
Question-centrism and the Left-Hand Move
Making the display part of the room
Pointing.
Humility in learning. Story of how Dialogue Mapping came about.